gen 480 Critical Thinking Case Study Directions

University of Phoenix MaterialCase Study Assignment
Assignment Overview
Prepare a report for the CEO of AcuScan about the situation described in the GEN 480 Critical Thinking Case Study. Your report should include the following two parts:
.1 Part One: Respond to the specific questions on the worksheet that follows (100 points possible).
.2 Part Two: Write an executive summary for the CEO of AcuScan. (100 points possible).
PART ONE:
Use the case materials to complete this assignment.
Analysis
Describe all assumptions seen in any of documents provided in the case study.
For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM: four to six assumptions held by Kelly; six to nine assumptions held by Pat; two to three assumptions held by Cliff; two to three assumptions held by Chris.
.a Kelly
.b Pat
.c Cliff
.d Chris
.2 Explain the arguments made by each of these people.
Explanations should comprise two to six sentences for each of the following:
.a Cliff O’Connor
.b Pat Lambert
.c Kelly Thomas
.d Chris Martinas
.3 Evaluate each argument listed above as sound or unsound and why. Indicate whether they are emotional or logical in nature.
Evaluations should comprise two to six sentences for each of the following:
.a Cliff O’Connor
.b Pat Lambert
.c Kelly Thomas
.d Chris Martinas
.4 Describe specific fallacious arguments, and identify the people who hold them.
For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM four to six fallacious arguments.
Conclusions
Describe all problems in this situation.
Describe a minimum of two to three problems that characterize the situation. Single sentence format is acceptable.
.1 For each problem listed above, describe the data, arguments, and reasoning that contribute to the problem.
Describe issues of data, arguments, and reasoning-related to each problem within two to six sentences.
.2 What is the underlying problem that is the base cause of the conflict within AcuScanPresent the underlying problem in one to four sentences.
.3…